The main characteristics that first of all pay attention to when choosing a monitor are image clarity, color quality, speed and type of matrix. With a more scrupulous approach, the monitor is also checked for the presence of light and dead pixels. In the rating, I have compiled a selection of monitors sharpened for different purposes that will be on sale in 2020. Each model has its own unique characteristics that make it suitable for specific activities - games, graphics, media viewing, etc. All this for each model will be considered in detail in the TOP 10 best monitors for a computer in 2020.
LG 22MK430H
The best 22-inch monitor with an IPS matrix, 1080p Full HD resolution opens the rating. Not marketed as a gaming monitor, but has AMD FreeSync technology that allows the image to move smoothly and without lag. There is black stabilization. Can be wall mounted.
Pros:
- Anti-reflective coating.
- Headphone output.
- Wall mounting.
- IPS matrix.
- Economical energy consumption.
- Fast image response.
- Very affordable price.
- When connected via HDMI, headphones can be connected.
Minuses:
- No USB hub.
- No flicker-free backlight.
- Not adjustable in height, only slopes. The stand itself is very uncomfortable.
The monitor is not positioned as a gaming monitor, but at the same time it has some functions that will be convenient for gamers - a sight, FreeSync technology and others. The color rendition is relatively good, the image is of high quality, slightly better than it could have been for 6,700 rubles. This monitor is suitable for games, working with texts, viewing media and simple surfing on the network, but for working with photos, graphics, etc. this model will not work due to the lack of HDR and 75 Hz frequency. Also note that this monitor does not include eye fatigue reduction technology.
This is a good budget monitor perfect for day to day use. It is difficult to compare it with other ranking models. For example, the next model from the same manufacturer LG 25UM58 with an average cost of 10,000 rubles has a slightly larger diagonal - 25 '' versus 21, another aspect ratio - 21: 9 versus 16: 9. The rest of the monitors are very similar, so even for 7,000 rubles you can get very good performance.
LG 25UM58
This is the best ultra widescreen monitor up to 10,000 rubles... Has an aspect ratio of 21: 9, it is considered optimal for complete immersion in what is happening on the screen and helps to better perceive information. IPS matrix is used. This monitor already has preset game modes for quick adjustment for different gaming genres, but it is still not positioned as a gaming monitor.
There is black stabilization, it supports 99% of the color field, which reduces color loss, is already more suitable for working with graphics and photos than the previous one, but still far from ideal, but its price is only 10,000 rubles. Simple setup menu that requires a mouse to access instead of buttons on the monitor.
Pros:
- price;
- design - wide screen, narrow bezel;
- IPS matrix;
- color rendering;
- large viewing angles;
- 2 x HDMI;
- Flicker-Free anti-flicker;
- HDMI cable included;
- you can work with two windows at the same time.
Minuses:
- factory image settings;
- glossy, not very stable, non-adjustable stand;
- not very convenient for working with documents due to the screen format;
- no VGA, DisplayPort connectors;
- no built-in acoustics.
An inexpensive monitor for gaming, watching videos and simply surfing the net, but it is not very convenient for working with documents precisely because of the non-standard aspect ratio - the height is less than standard, but for games this size, on the contrary, will be very convenient. The wide screen is also convenient in that it can easily replace two monitors, if by the nature of the activity it is necessary to use many windows.
A very good monitor for little money. For comparison, the next model in the rating from the same manufacturer, but with a cost twice as high: LG 24UD58. Its diagonal is smaller, but the resolution and the number of colors are higher, the frequency is lower - 61 Hz, there is a DISPLAYPORT input. The model we are reviewing is the most economical in terms of energy consumption compared to the LG 24UD58 and the previous model under review from the manufacturer. The rest of the models are very similar.
LG 24UD58
Continues rating best 24 inch monitor... This monitor is already more tailored for games than the previous two - it has FreeSyns technology and many game settings that help to adapt to the type of game. Convenient OSD menu helps to easily adjust monitor settings. The model will be convenient for those who work with several windows at once, it helps to replace several monitors - special software divides the screen into several parts, each of which houses its own program, with a choice of 14 division options. High 4K resolution screen, black stabilization.
Pros:
- Juicy, rich color reproduction. High definition. Super detailed matrix.
- Tear-free picture thanks to high pixel density.
- Excellent viewing angles.
- Flicker, no glare. Eyes don't get tired.
- Laconic design.
Minuses:
- No HDR support.
- The location of the connectors seems inconvenient to some buyers. The headphone jack is also located at the back.
- The stand is not height adjustable.
This monitor outperforms its competitors precisely by the ratio of the screen diagonal and its resolution, in this ratio it is very difficult to see the pixels. But such parameters make it difficult to configure, since not every program can adjust itself to the resolution and size, as a result, the image is too small. For the indicated price, with the available resolution and color rendering, the monitor has practically no competitors.
If you need a screen with similar characteristics, but a large size, I advise you to take a closer look at DELL UltraSharp U2718Q: the diagonal is much larger - 27 '', the resolution and type of matrix are the same. At the same time, Dell has a higher frame rate - 86 Hz and has support for HDR10. True, LG will be more convenient to use if you need to connect several devices, it has two HDMI inputs versus 1 for DELL, the latter compensates for this by the presence of a MINI DISPLAYPORT input, a USB hub. In addition, DELL can be turned 90 degrees, but its price is much higher - about 40,000 rubles, while LG will cost an average of 20,000.
HP EliteDisplay E273q
An inexpensive high-quality monitor with all the necessary functions to preserve your vision. The American company tried and did best eye monitor in the ratio "price-quality". The HP EliteDisplay E273q allows you to display more data on the screen and produces crisp, clean lines, which is especially pleasing when working with documents. Ultra-thin bezel. Very fine adjustment of height, tilt and swivel. There is a 90 degree swivel and a swivel stand. A large number of connectors for connection.
Pros:
- Good color rendering.
- No glare on a black background (at least in my copy).
- Convenient and reliable stand, convenient height adjustment.
- Narrow bezels at the top and sides.
- Adequate backlight brightness.
- Beautiful design.
- Switchable work indicator (if it bothers anyone).
- The kit includes an HDMI cable and DisplayPort, both of which are of sufficient length (my system unit is not very close to the screen).
- Minuses:
- The bezel-lessness is rather relative, all the same from the edge of the image to the outer edge of about 6 mm, but this is practically for all monitors of this type.
- There is still a crystalline effect, but it is true that it can be seen only from a very close distance with a strong desire, in general, not in operating mode.
The monitor in the price range is not far from the LG considered above, on average it will cost 23 800 rubles. Very convenient stand, can be installed end-to-end with another monitor, USB ports installed on the side do not interfere with this. A very good choice for vector graphics, sound editors, office tasks. The diagonal is impressive - 27 '', while it is possible to work with different windows, so it can easily replace the second monitor. In terms of image quality, it cannot compete with the LG 24UD58, since with its diagonal it has a FullHD resolution, but this is only comparative, in general, the picture at the monitor is at its best. If you want the best picture quality, move on to the next monitor in the ranking, but be prepared to pay twice as much.
DELL UltraSharp U2718Q
Continues TOP best monitor 27 inch... A model with uncompromising image quality and excellent functionality. Designed for multiple tasks at the same time: the screen breaks easily into pieces. Dell HDR technology is responsible for color depth, clarity and contrast, the image is very realistic. The screen with a resolution of 4K has a 27-inch diagonal and a pixel density of 163 ppi, a 10-bit matrix made using IPS technology to cope with displaying HDR10 images. With a functional stand, the position of the screen can be adjusted in all planes, while the Pivot function allows the screen to be rotated both clockwise and counterclockwise.
Pros:
- Aesthetics, appearance.
- Lots of screen position adjustments.
- Wall mount.
- Excellent image quality.
- The colors are bright and juicy.
- Large range of settings.
Minuses:
- Highlights.
- One HDMI.
- Short cables.
DELL positions the monitor as a professional tool for working with graphics and photos, it does not transmit colors very correctly, although there is support for HDR10. It is not suitable for working with graphics and photographs, only using it as an ordinary home computer, playing games, working with documents, which, at its cost (41,000 rubles), suggests that it is advisable to purchase. Some users complain about uneven backlighting, glare.
If uniform backlighting is important, pay attention to Viewsonic VP2785-4K, it has uneven backlight compensation, and, by the way, there are much more connectors than DELL, although its price will be 1.5 times more. If you choose from less expensive competitors, then I would advise you to return to the LG 24UD58, it is much more suitable for working with graphics than the DELL in question, just keep in mind that the "skis" have a smaller screen.
ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ
This monitor is fundamentally different from the previous models in the rating - its screen is curved, size 32 ''. The color gamut is expanded - 125% sRGB, FreeSyns technology. The rear panel has backlighting and customizable light projection, although these functions are not affected. Convenient tilt, swivel and height adjustment. But the high refresh rate is already interesting, especially for gamers - 144 Hz. Also for gamers there are additional useful functions in the form of a sight, etc.
Slim bezel, ideal for multi-monitor use. Convenient software for quickly changing monitor settings, without exiting the menu. If you have to spend a lot of time at the computer, then this model is for you - reduced screen flicker and blue filtering. ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ can be safely called the best 32-inch monitor.
Pros:
- Large diagonal, curved screen and thin bezel for comfort while gaming.
- Good anti-reflective coating.
- High resolution, pixels are visible only at very close range.
- Deep blacks, rich vivid colors.
- Good build quality.
- Great viewing angles.
- Apps for gamers.
- MINI DISPLAYPORT input.
- USB hub, interface - USB TYPE B, USB version - 3.0.
Minuses:
- Increased requirements for the video card.
- Massive leg, takes up a lot of space on the table.
A monitor with very good color reproduction, large size, curved screen and frame rate make it a good choice for gaming. But the ratio of the diagonal and the resolution is embarrassing; when watching videos and working with graphics, the pixels may seem a little large. The average price for a monitor is 45,000 rubles, with the available characteristics and design it is quite justified.
If you are confused by FullHD with a 32 '' diagonal, take a closer look at the AORUS AD27QD, see it in more detail below. The cost of this model is a couple of thousand rubles higher, the diagonal is 5 '' less, the resolution is similar to ASUS, but the IPS matrix is used, the monitor in question has a VA matrix. The frame rate is the same, but the brightness of the AORUS is higher, the screen is not curved, both monitors are positioned as gaming monitors.
Another more expensive option that is worth considering is ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q, its price is much higher, but it uses an IPS matrix, 34 '' diagonal, resolution 3440x1440, we will also talk about it in detail below.
AORUS AD27QD
A nimble monitor with a wide color range and brightness reserve. Frameless design. Many useful functions for gamers, displaying the system status using a special application. Supports picture-by-picture and picture-in-picture functions, displays images from different inputs, AMD Radeon FreeSync technology. Convenient and fine adjustment of the stand. AORUS AD27QD is one of Best gaming monitors of 2020... Sight Stabilizer - Prevents blurring of the image around the scope. Black Equalizer - Helps distinguish objects in shadow by increasing contrast. OSD Widget - Allows you to customize display settings using your keyboard and mouse.
Pros:
- ergonomics;
- complete set (all necessary cables);
- image quality;
- convenient control of functions using special software;
- resolution - WQHD;
- quick response;
- large margin of brightness;
- a set of gaming functions;
- built-in USB hub.
Minuses:
- price;
- illumination of the matrix;
- short power cable;
- no built-in acoustics;
- Microphone noise cancellation is only supported for headsets from GIGABYTE's own AORUS line;
- USB and audio connectors are brought down;
- large stand.
A monitor with excellent speed, functionality and color rendering can be used for games and professional work with graphics; in the second case, you will have to tinker with adjusting the colors. In general, the colors are well pre-set from the factory and you won't have to adjust anything for semi-professional or home use. There is practically no glare, although almost all IPS matrices suffer from this. If you are looking for best 144hz monitor With good functionality, a large number of inputs and a fast response time (1ms), the AORUS AD27QD is what you need. I recommend buying it even if its average cost is 47,000 rubles.
If you need a better resolution, the next in the list in the rating is Viewsonic VP2785-4K with a resolution of 3840x2160, AORUS has a resolution of 2560x1440, the diagonal of the monitors is the same, but the frame rate of Viewsonic is lower - 60 Hz. The Viewsonic has significantly more inputs, moreover, an external power supply, but it is not positioned as a gaming monitor, unlike the AORUS.
Viewsonic VP2785-4K
It is positioned as a professional monitor for working with photos, graphics and video. This statement confirms UltraHD resolution, 99% Abode RGB and 95% DCI-P3. Monitors are factory calibrated to provide high fidelity colors. Hardware calibration can be performed with the optional Colorbration Kit. Works on PBP scheme, replacing two monitors.
Pros:
- Excellent design and ergonomics.
- Lots of settings.
- Built-in technologies and modes for easy operation.
- State of the art HDCP2.2 content protection.
- High quality of color rendition and level of detail of objects.
Minuses:
- High price.
- Flimsy stand.
Viewsonic VP2785-4K - the best monitor for photographers and designers... This is not a gaming monitor and should not be used as such, you can choose cheaper counterparts for games, this is a workhorse for those who care about correct and uniform color reproduction in their work. This monitor also has such nice additions as built-in backlight, presence sensor and KVM switch.
If you need a less expensive monitor for gaming and home use, go back to the ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ, which we reviewed earlier. Its diagonal is larger at a lower resolution, it uses a VA matrix, the screen is curved, but these characteristics are enough for games, especially considering the rather nimble work and the price. Viewsonic will cost 62,000 rubles, which is 15,000 more than the cost of the aforementioned ASUS. More powerful and expensive gaming monitor - AORUS AD27QD. A really good competitor to Viewsonic in the eyes of designers and photographers is the next model in our rating.
LG 32UL950
Continues rating best 4K monitor... Color calibration capability - the picture on the monitor is brought to the ideal. Conveys 98% of the DCI-P3 color space, such requirements for monitors used for creating special effects in professional cinematography. Supports VESA DisplayHDR 600 standard, provides a high dynamic range of 600 candela peak brightness.
Thunderbolt 3 Daisy Chain - Connects two 4K monitors and a laptop with a single cable, providing power to the laptop's battery. At the same time it is able to quickly process high-capacity images. Another design feature: built-in 5W speakers.
Pros:
- Large color gamut, excellent color reproduction.
- Good screen brightness.
- HDR.
- Trunderbolt.
- Built-in speakers with normal sound.
- Thin frames.
- Large number of inputs and cables for all connectors.
- Frameless design.
Disadvantages:
- Few backlight zones to stabilize black.
- The impressive size of the external power supply.
- Unsuccessful design solution for fixing the matrix.
At the moment, the average cost of a monitor will be 67,000 rubles. A good model for those who work with graphics, excellent color rendition even at the factory calibration, but for professional use the colors will still have to be adjusted. The only thing that confuses this model is the original matrix mount. The design of the monitor is completely without frames, the matrix itself is slightly moved forward, which is why some users complained about its sagging, but in later batches this was not observed, apparently, the manufacturer corrected the situation.
Compared to the previous model in the rating, which is also positioned as a professional monitor for working with photos and graphics, the LG screen is noticeably larger - 32 'versus 27 for Viewsonic with the same resolution and aspect ratio. They support different HDR standards, LG has Display HDR 600, Viewsonic has HDR10. LG has higher brightness and contrast, built-in speakers, which Viewsonic does not. But in terms of the number of inputs, Viewsonic has no equal, in this indicator it has surpassed LG. I recommend both monitors for purchase.
ASUS ROG Swift PG348Q
Rounding out the rating is the best ultra widescreen monitor. Gaming frameless model with curved screen, 3440x1440 resolution and 21: 9 aspect ratio. Compatible with NVIDIA G-Syns. The design matches the entire series of ROG gaming monitors, LED backlighting, a rather interesting appearance. Convenient switching of the refresh rate - the button is placed on the body, it can be adjusted between 60 and 100 Hz.
GanePlus gaming-friendly features found in all monitors in this line. GameVisual - Quickly adjust your monitor to suit your current needs. There is blue filtering and screen flicker elimination to reduce eye fatigue. Convenient stand. The monitor has a cooling function, but is implemented in such a way that it is quiet and does not require regular maintenance. The monitor has 2W stereo speakers.
Pros:
- design;
- good materials and build quality;
- large curved screen;
- convenient control;
- image quality;
- viewing angles;
- built-in USB hub;
- gaming functions;
- built-in acoustics.
Minuses:
- price;
- sound quality of built-in acoustics;
- large stand;
- highlights on the matrix.
A universal monitor tailored to the needs of gamers, but can be used for other purposes as well. Supports picture-in-picture function, can easily replace multiple monitors when working with documents, graphics and more. The average cost is about 77,000 rubles - with such a price tag, the monitor simply has to be universal, and it is - a good model for different purposes.
It is rather difficult to compare it with other models, given the huge 34 '' diagonal, the number of functions and the original design, but if you need a model for games with a lower price, you can compare it with the AORUS AD27QD. With a 27 '' diagonal, its resolution is 2560x1440, the refresh rate is even higher - 144 Hz, the aspect ratio is different, quick response, HDR support, fewer interfaces, there is a 90-degree rotation. With a significant difference in price between these monitors, it's worth considering.
